A perfect knockdown consists of mRNA
reduction and a corresponding change in protein expression. Unfortunately, this
is not always the case and there are often times when proteins show an increase
or no change. This does not necessarily mean that a knockdown was not
effective; rather, it may have occurred because of other cellular processes
relating to translation or protein half-life.
Here are a few reasons why your mRNA and
protein expression measures may differ:
* If there are multiple alternative
transcripts and isoforms of a protein, selective knockdown of one
transcript/isoform may lead to increased translation of the other transcripts.
If all your isoforms are approximately the same size on a western blot and you
do not have a specific antibody targeting your isoform of interest, don’t be
surprised if you see an increase in protein expression. The same applies to transcript
levels if you are using pan primers.
* MicroRNAs can regulate gene expression by
inhibiting translation of existing mRNA and/or promote mRNA degradation. Hence,
decreases in target protein expression may not necessarily match the direction
of change of mRNA levels. Which route is taken may depend on the degree of
base-pairing between the miRNA and miRNA-binding site.
* There can be more than one miRNA recognition
element (MRE) for the same or different miRNAs within the 3’UTR of a transcript
of interest. Different MREs can function cooperatively to enhance repression. Accordingly,
more than one miRNA may be needed for effective knockdown.
* Protein-half life is also relevant. For
instance, a target protein containing a PEST sequence will have a short
intracellular half-life compared to those that do not.
* The type of protein or function of the protein
may also be important. For instance, cell signaling proteins typically have a
short-half life whereas glycolytic proteins typically have a long half life.
* Culturing conditions may also influence
mRNA and protein expression. For instance, oxidative stress, growth factors,
etc will have an impact.
References:
2. To et al. (2008) Regulation of ABCG2
expression at the 3′ untranslated region of its mRNA through modulation of transcript stability and protein translationby a putative microRNA in the S1 colon cancer cell-line. Molecular and Cellular Biology 28:5147-5161.
4. Lal et al. (2009) miR-24 inhibits cell
proliferation by targeting E2F2, MYC, and other cell-cycle genes via binding to
‘seedless' 3′UTR microRNA recognition elements. Molecular Cell 35:610-625.
No comments:
Post a Comment