There are arguments for and against the use
of antibiotics (e.g. penicillin/streptomycin) in cell culture. On the one hand,
it is a useful prophylactic to prevent cultures from contamination by providing
a layer of protection. However, arguments have been made against its use with
claims that constant usage allows for unintentional selection of antibiotic
resistant bacteria, researchers become reliant on it and becoming lax in applying
aseptic techniques and good cell culture practice.
I am inclined towards the latter view of
avoiding the use of antibiotics, but mainly because antibiotics can interfere
with particular experiments, namely transfections. However, I do find that it is
better to use aseptic techniques because it is better to know quickly that your
cells are contaminated rather than have low level contamination hang around
which is not visible. The danger of low level contamination is that it will
affect and alter your cells and interfere with your experiments.
In regards to students or researchers
learning cell culture for the first time, it is probably better for them to see
how lapse in aseptic practice can easily lead to contamination. People learn
from their mistakes and will only improve with practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment